Following my post yesterday on the Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part Two, I thought I should look into other multi-part films in Hollywood to try and understand why people make these kinds of films.
It seems to me that, in many cases, the process of splitting films is due to financial motivations in turning successful books into longer film series.
One controversial example of this was 'The Hobbit' which is a three-part adaption of a novel, the running time was the result of adding material that was not part of the original book. As the script was being developed by director Peter Jackson, the additional material added from Tolkien's notes and of Jackson's creation required splitting the film into separate parts. Now this could be said to be due to the director wanting to add his own touch to the film and to exercise his creative freedom, however it can also be argued that they did this to maximise profit. Which is a good move for the movie producers, but it is exploitative of the fans of the book, to be selling it as the Hobbit when it is actually not a true representation of the book.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgJNEukr-RceMm8nDQc0c7tkFhSrG8Vq0l401Mra5yLPaWzYdRgPUZ2XaL3K2FDqjAEG3DhvNto3HaRinRtAK4nYS6YLRTmRrIEr4-VFvTtUNve-7CRUqSTc1DJZgXSqzt7sQkw1h5kg4qO/s320/Kill-Bill.jpeg)
Another example of this is Kill Bill, its original cut lasted 4 hours so Quentin Tarantino decided it needed to be split into two parts. The big difference between this and a film like The Hunger Games, for example, is that it is an original creation made for the big screen, not an adaptation of a book which was never intended to be split in half. The last instalment of Harry Potter was split into two halves, this was apparently because there was too much content to fit into one film. However surely the author never intended each half of the book to be experienced one year apart. This suggests to me that the reason for this was to maximise the profits, especially as the other films had been so popular.
The first half of the film was the least popular out of the whole serious; perhaps suggesting that this was due to the film being split in half. However the second half was a critical success, showing how it is not always a disaster to cut a story in half even when it was not originally intended to be experienced in this way.
One reason that is given for splitting novels from series like Harry Potter, The Hunger Games and Twilight is to appease fans who do not want the series to end. In a way this makes sense, however it is somehow doubtful to me that they are "doing it for the fans" the much more likely explanation being that studios want to drag out money making films as long as they possibly can.
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_films_split_into_multiple_parts